Back to Blog

Bitcoin ETFs: Between Wall Street's Appeal and Islamic Ethical Principles

November 10, 2025
2 vues
0 commentaires

Introduction

The cryptocurrency market has recently been shaken by a fascinating paradox: while financial giants like BlackRock and Fidelity are strengthening their presence in the Bitcoin ETF (Exchange-Traded Funds) sector, these very financial products have recorded massive capital outflows, reaching $1.2 billion in a single week [1]. This situation highlights a growing tension between the institutionalization of Bitcoin and its original decentralized nature. For the Muslim investor, this phenomenon raises fundamental ethical questions, notably concerning uncertainty (Gharar), speculation (Maysir), and the centralization of financial power.

This article aims to analyze this news in depth, exploring the underlying market dynamics and offering an ethical perspective based on the principles of Islamic finance. We will examine whether Wall Street's enthusiasm for Bitcoin ETFs is compatible with a responsible investment approach that complies with Sharia.

The Complex Dynamics of Bitcoin ETFs

To understand the ethical issues, it is essential to grasp the mechanism of Bitcoin ETFs and their impact on the market. A Bitcoin ETF is a fund that tracks the price of Bitcoin. Investors buy shares of the ETF on traditional stock markets without having to hold the cryptocurrency directly. This ease of access has attracted many institutional investors, but it also introduces a layer of intermediation that is not without consequences.

The recent massive capital outflows, representing the third-largest weekly outflow ever recorded, contrast with Wall Street's apparent enthusiasm. According to market analysts, these outflows do not signal a total capitulation but rather a reduction of positions after a period of significant gains [1]. However, this behavior suggests high volatility and a speculative mentality, which can be problematic from the perspective of Islamic finance.

IndicatorDataSource
Bitcoin ETF Outflows$1.2 billionSoSoValue [1]
Ethereum ETF Outflows$508 millionSoSoValue [1]
Solana ETF Inflows$137 millionSoSoValue [1]
Bitcoin Price (11/10/25)$106,172CoinDesk [1]

Ethical Analysis in Light of Islamic Finance

Islamic finance rests on several pillars, including the prohibition of Riba (interest), Gharar (excessive uncertainty), and Maysir (speculation). Analyzing Bitcoin ETFs through this lens reveals several points of friction.

The Specter of Gharar

Gharar, or excessive uncertainty, is a central concept. In the case of Bitcoin ETFs, the investor does not directly hold the private keys to their assets. They rely on a custodian (such as Coinbase for BlackRock's ETF) to secure the Bitcoins. This delegation of control creates uncertainty regarding the actual custody of the funds. In the event of the custodian's bankruptcy or mismanagement, the investor could lose their capital. This opacity and lack of direct control can be considered a form of Gharar.

Moreover, a large portion of institutional transactions occurs "off-chain," meaning they are not recorded on the Bitcoin blockchain. As Annabelle Huang of Altius Labs points out, this reduces transparency and traceability—features that are fundamental to blockchain technology [1].

The Issue of Speculation (Maysir)

The extreme volatility of cryptocurrencies is well known. The massive capital movements in ETFs, such as those recently observed, reflect highly speculative behavior. Investors appear to seek quick gains rather than long-term growth based on the intrinsic value of the asset. This mentality resembles Maysir, which is prohibited in Islamic finance.

A quote from a report by Enflux is illuminating in this regard: "When the Fed injects liquidity, Bitcoin rises; when yields fluctuate, it falls. The dream of decoupling is, for now, over" [1]. This close correlation with traditional monetary policies reinforces the idea that Bitcoin is treated as a speculative asset among others, rather than as an independent store of value.

Centralization vs. Decentralization

One of Bitcoin's major appeals is its decentralized nature. However, the rise of ETFs, controlled by a handful of large financial institutions, threatens this fundamental principle. This concentration of power in the hands of traditional actors runs counter to the ethics of decentralization and individual empowerment advocated by blockchain technology.

This centralization also poses a systemic risk. If one of these major players were to fail, the repercussions on the entire crypto ecosystem could be devastating. From the perspective of Maslaha (public interest), this concentration of risks is difficult to justify.

Toward More Ethical Crypto Investment

In light of these observations, the Muslim investor must exercise caution. While ETFs may seem like an easy gateway into the world of cryptocurrencies, they carry significant ethical risks. It is crucial to ask the right questions before investing, as suggested by an article from Ethical Finance: Is the underlying asset Sharia-compliant? Is the structure transparent and backed by real assets? [2]

Alternatives exist, such as directly holding cryptocurrencies in a non-custodial wallet, which allows full control over one's assets. Emerging projects also aim to create crypto investment products specifically designed to be Sharia-compliant, based on tangible assets and avoiding speculative structures.

Conclusion

The current news about Bitcoin ETFs reflects the tensions running through the crypto ecosystem. The allure of institutional money is powerful, but it comes at the cost of compromises that may conflict with the ethical principles of Islamic finance. The uncertainty related to fund custody, the speculative nature of investments, and the growing centralization of power are all warning signs for the Muslim investor.

It is not a question of outright rejecting all forms of financial innovation but rather adopting a critical and informed approach. Islamic finance invites us to seek investments that are not only profitable but also just, transparent, and beneficial to society as a whole. Bitcoin ETFs, in their current form, still seem far from meeting these requirements.

References

[1] Reynolds, S., & Godbole, O. (2025, November 10). Bitcoin ETF Outflows Hit $1.2 Billion Even as Wall Street Deepens Its Crypto Bets. CoinDesk. https://www.coindesk.com/fr/markets/2025/11/10/bitcoin-etf-outflows-hit-usd1-2b-even-as-wall-street-deepens-its-crypto-bets

[2] Ethical Finance. (2025, October 13). Crypto ETFs to Surge in the US – What It Means for Muslim Crypto Holders. https://ethicalfinance.co/2025/10/crypto-etfs-to-surge-in-the-us-what-it-means-for-muslim-crypto-holders/

Comments (0)

Leave a comment

Chargement du CAPTCHA...

Aucun commentaire pour le moment. Soyez le premier à commenter !